October 21, 2015 - CIA Email Hack & Joe Biden's 2016 Plans

  • 10/21/2015

The CIA chief falls prey to hackers, and Larry discusses Joe Biden's announcement that he won't be running for president with Holly Walker, Ryan Duffy and Terry Crews.

>> Larry: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WELCOME TO "NIGHTLY SHOW."

I CAN'T DO THAT IMPRESSION.

"MARTY."

ANYWAY, I'M NOT DOUG BROWN.

I'M LARRY WILMORE.

WE'VE GOT A GREAT SHOW FOR YOUTONIGHT.

TERRY CREWS WILL BE JOINING USON THE PANEL.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )VERY EXCITED.

CAN'T WAIT.

BUT WE BEGIN WITH SOME BREAKINGNEWS FROM EARLIER TODAY.

THE BIG QUESTION THAT HAS BEENPLAGUING EVERYBODY WITH A JOB IN

TV NEWS IT-- AND EVERYBODY WITHLIGHT SOCIAL CALENDARS HAVE

BEEN-- WILL JOE BIDEN RUN FORPRESIDENT?

AS YOU MAY KNOW, BIDEN HAD ASCHEDULED ROSE GARDEN

ANNOUNCEMENT TODAY TO FINALLYANSWER THIS QUESTION.

BUT LIKE A LABRADOODLE IN ATENNIS BALL FACTORY, CNN COULD

NOT HANDLE THE ANTICIPATION.

>> JOE BIDEN PLANS TO MAKE ANANNOUNCEMENT.

>> WHAT THE VICE PRESIDENT ISGOING TO SAY TODAY.

>> PRESUMABLY IS THE DAY.

>> HE'S GOING TO ANNOUNCE HE'SRUNNING.

>> NO, I'M NOT RUNNING.

COULD THIS BE THAT MESSAGE?

>> THAT'S ALL SHEER SPECULATIONRIGHT NOW.

HE'S GOING TO TELL US HE'S NOTRUNNING AND IT COULD BE HE IS

RUNNING.

>> WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

>> Larry: WHY DON'T YOU JUSTWAIT FIVE ( BLEEP ) MINUTES!

FIVE MINUTES!

JUST WAIT.

THAT'S ALL YOU'VE GOT TO DO.

HE'S ABOUT TO TELL YOU.

YOU DON'T NEED TO PREDICT THENEWS.

( LAUGHTER )YOU'RE JUST SUPPOSED TO REPORT

IT AFTER IT HAPPENS.

BEFORE IT HAPPENS, IT'S NOT EVENNEWS YET.

YOU CAN'T "MINORITY REPORT" THENEWS.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )NOT, NOT HOW IT WORKS.

SLOW DOWN.

OKAY, SO DID HE OR DIDN'T HE?

>> I BELIEVE WE'RE OUT OF TIME,THE TIME NECESSARY TO MOUNT A

WINNING CAMPAIGN.

>> Larry: WOW.

MAYBE IF YOU WEREN'T SOFOCUSED ON MOUNTING IT RIGHT OFF

THE BAT.

MAYBE IF YOU SPENT A LITTLE TIMEWOOING THE CAMPAIGN FIRST.

YOU KNOW, TAKE IT OUT TO DINNER.

( LAUGHTER )ASK IT WHAT KIND OF MUSIC IT

LIKES.

UN, SHOW AMERICA YOU'REINTERESTED IN THE CAMPAIGN

BEFORE YOU GO BARRELING TOWARDSMOUNTING IT.

ALL RIGHT, WELL NOW THAT BIDENIS OFFICIALLY NOT MOUNTING, IT'S

SAFE TO SAY WE KNOW WHO WILL GETTHE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION,

LINCOLN CHAFEE.

( LAUGHTER )YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST!

EXACTLY RIGHT.

( APPLAUSE )GET OUT OF HERE!

GET!

THERE YOU GO!

ALL RIGHT, LET'S MOVE ON.

BIG NEWS IN THE WORLD OFCOMPUTER HACKERS THIS WEEK.

>> SOURCES CONFIRM A BREACH INTHE ACCOUNTS OF C.I.A. DIRECTOR

JOHN BRENNAN AND HOMELANDSECURITY SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON.

>> OKAY, NOW I KNOW IT SOUNDSBAD, BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THE

HACKERS WERE ONLY ABLE TOPENETRATE BRENNAN AND JOHNSON'S

PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNTS.

THEIR WORK ACCOUNTS ARE SAFE,AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THEIR

NETFLIX ACCOUNTS ARE SAFE.

WHICH MEANS THEY CAN STILLINVITE BAE OVER TO CHILL.

I HAVE TO SAY, YOU'RE LAUGHING,BUT THE ONLY PROBLEM WITH

NETFLIX AND CHILLING IS 50MINUTES INTO IT HE LOOKED AT

YOU LIKE THIS.

I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THAT MEANS.

BUT DESPITE BEING BRENNAN ANDJOHNSON'S PERSONAL E-MAIL

ACCOUNTS, THERE WAS SENSITIVEWORK INFORMATION BEING PASSED

AROUND.

FOR INSTANCE, BRENNAN'S A.O.L.

ACCOUNTS YIELDED THE NAMES ANDSOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OF

SEVERAL TOP INTELLIGENCEOFFICIALS AND IT ALSO CONTAINED

HIS 47-PAGE SECURITY CLEARANCEAPPLICATION.

UM, QUICK NOTE TO THE C.I.A.--MAYBE SOMEWHERE IN THAT 47

PAGES, YOU CAN FIND ROOM FOR THEQUESTION, "WHY DO YOU HAVE A

DAMN A.O.L. E-MAIL ACCOUNT?"A.O.L.!

SERIOUSLY, AMERICA!

THIS IS THE C.I.A.!

CAN'T WE DO BETTER?

I MEAN, I DON'T CARE IF THIS ISBRENNAN'S PRIVATE E-MAIL.

WHAT, DID THEY THINK IT WASPATRIOTIC TO BE ON AMERICA

ONLINE?

"OH, WE NEED TO GO ONLINE, ANDTHIS IS AMERICA.

WHAT SHOULD WE CHOOSE?""HOW ABOUT AMERICA ONLINE."

"WHO SAID THAT?""JOHNSON, YOU'RE ON FIRE."

AMERICA ONLINE.

ARE THEY USING DIAL-UP TOO?

NOW IT'S TIME TO PLAY C.I.A.

THEATER, "JOHN BRENNAN C.I.A.

DIRECTOR GOES ONLINE."

EEEHH.

ERRRRR.

ARRRR.

MEGAN GET OFF THE DAMN PHONEYOUR FATHER IT'S TRYING TO GET

SOME INTEL ON SYRIA!

THIS HAS BEEN CIA THEATER, THANKYOU VERY MUCH.

AND HOW DOES HAVING AN A.O.L.

E-MAIL ACCOUNT AT THIS HIGH ALEVEL NOT RAISE A RED FLAG IN

2015?

I LOOK AT A.O.L. ON AN E-MAILTHE SAME WAY OLD WHITE PEOPLE

LOOK AT THE NAME DESHAWN ON ARESUME?

ALL RIGHT?

I MEAN, SORRY, DESHAWN.

( LAUGHTER )IT'S SO UNFAIR TO DESHAWN, TOO.

I MEAN, AT THE VERY LEAST, GETSOME G-MAIL WITH TWO-STEP

VERIFICATION.

AND IN THIS DAY AND AGE,UNPROTECTED E-MAIL IS JUST LIKE

UNPROTECTED SEX.

SURE IT'S EASIER AND THERE'SLESS TO THINK ABOUT BUT IT'S A

GOOD WAY TO END UP WITH SOMEONEIN THERE YOU WEREN'T EXPECTING.

( LAUGHTER )( APPLAUSE )

IS THAT'S TRUE!

BABIES ARE JUST NATURE'S LITTLEHACKERS.

THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE.

HACKERS.

BUT FORGET ALL THIS.

THE REAL QUESTION IS WHO ARETHESE GUYS?

>> A GROUP CALLING THEMSELVESCWA., IS TAKING CREDIT FOR

HACKING INTO THEIR PRIVATEE-MAIL ACCOUNT.

>> Larry: HMMM.

( LAUGHTER )C.W.A.

WHAT DOES THAT STAND FOR CRYPTOWARFARE ANARCHIST.

CYBER WARRIORS OF AMERICA.

CYBER WARFARE ANONYMOUS.

NO, WAIT, CYBER WEB ASSASSIN.

SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

>> C.W.A., OR CRACKAS WITHATTITUDE.

( LAUGHTER )>> Larry: CRACKAS WITH

ATTITUDE?

THESE ARE THE PEOPLE BREAKINGINTO THE C.I.A.

WHO IS YOUR LEADER, EAZY-EMAIL?

CRACKAS WITH ATTITUDE, I'M JUSTJOKING, MAN.

DON'T HACK ME.

( LAUGHTER )ALL RIGHT, SO WHAT ELSE DO WE

KNOW ABOUT THESE GUYS?

>> CAN YOU GIVE US ANYINDICATION OF YOUR BACKGROUND?

I MEAN HOW OLD YOU ARE?

ARE YOU IN THE UNITED STATES?

>> I'M THE AGE OF 22 YEARS OLD,SMOKE POT.

>> AND YOU SMOKE POT.

>> ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.

( LAUGHTER )( APPLAUSE )

>> Larry: "ALL DAY, EVERYDAY."

AND THEY BREACHED SECRETINFORMATION ON BOTH THE HEAD OF

THE C.I.A. AND HOMELANDSECURITY?

THAT'S FREAKIN' AWESOME, MAN.

I MEAN, DON'T GET ME WRONG.

IT'S A BUMMER ABOUT THE NATIONALSECURITY STUFF, BUT COME ON

ALL DAY, EVERY DAY\

I MEAN, NOT SEVERALTIMES A DAY.

I MEAN NOT WHEN THEIR BUDDIESFROM COLLEGE ARE IN TOWN.

NOT WHEN THEY'RE WATCHING AMOVIE OR PLAYING A VIDEO GAME.

JUST ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.

THAT MEANS WHEN THEY'RE NOTHIGH, THEY'RE ASLEEP.

( LAUGHTER )THIS IS EITHER A MARK OF

EXTRAORDINARY GENIUS OR WE HAVESOME HORRIBLE ( BLEEP ) NATIONAL

SECURITY.

ALL RIGHT, SO IF HE SMOKES ALLDAY, WAS THIS TEEN HACKER HIGH

WHEN HE DID THIS?

>> YOU THINK YOU MIGHT HAVEHACKED THE DIRECTOR OF THE

C.I.A. WHILE YOU WERE HIGH?

>> PROBABLY.

>> Larry: ARE YOU NOTLISTENING TO HIM?

HE SAID ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.

THAT'S WHEN HE SMOKES WEED.

SO THE HACKER SAID HEWAS ABLE TO HACK INTO BRENNAN'S

E-MAIL VIA SOCIAL ENGINEERING.

THAT'S A NERDY WAY OF SAYING HECALLED VERIZON AND TALKED THEM

INTO GIVING HIM BRENNAN'SPERSONAL INFORMATION.

THIS EXPLAINS TIME WARNER'S NEWSLOGAN-- WE KEEP YOU ON HOLD

UNTIL YOU GET BEDSORES BUT ATLEAST WE DON'T GIVE OUT YOUR

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.

VERY SUCCESSFUL WITH THAT.

SPEAKING OF E-MAIL SCANDALS, IWONDER WHY I'M NOT HEARING FOR

THE CALLS FOR BRENNAN'S ORJOHNSON'S HEADS IN THE SAME WAY

I'M HEARING THE CALLS FORHILLARYS?

( CHEERS )WHICH IS STRANGE, CONSIDERING

JOHNSON AND BRENNAN ACTUALLY HADTHEIR SENSITIVE PERSONAL E-MAIL

SERVERS HACKED AND CLINTON DIDNOT AND SHE IS SET TO TESTIFY

BEFORE A HOSTILE AND POLITICALLYDRIVEN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE.

I'M NOT SAYING I AGREE WITHHILLARY'S DECISION TO DO WHAT

SHE DID WITH HER E-MAILS BUT ONETHING SHE DID DO, SHE WAS TRYING

TO MAKE HER COMMUNICATIONS MORESECURE.

AND HERE THESE GUYS IN CHARGE OFGOVERNMENT SECRETS ARE ALMOST

GOING OUT OF THEIR WAY TO MAKETHINGS LESS SECURE.

IRONICALLY, THIS STORY WILLPROBABLY BE FORGOTTEN BY THE END

OF THE WEEK IF THE OUTRAGE ABOUTHILLARY WILL LAST UNTIL THE

PEOPLE DOING IT HAVE SUCCEEDEDIN HER NOT BEING PRESIDENT.

BUT IF 22-YEAR-OLD SAVANTESTONER HACKERS CAN'T FIND HER

E-MAILS, MAYBE THIS PERSONSHOULD BE THE ONE IN CHARGE OF

THE C.I.A.

WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK.

>> Larry: WELCOME BACK.

I'M HERE WITH MY PANEL.

"NIGHTLY SHOW" CONTRIBUTOR,HOLLY WALKER.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )HE'S EXECUTIVE PRODUCER AND HOST

OF THE NEW HUFFINGTON POSTSERIES "NOW WHAT," JOURNALIST

RYAN DUFFY.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )AND YOU CATCH HIS SHOWS

"BROOKLYN NINE-NINE" AND"WORLD'S FUNNIEST" ON FOX, THIS

MAN IS WORKING ALL THE TIME,ACTOR TERRY CREWS.

YEAH, TERRY.

AND FOR EVERYONE AT HOME, JOINOUR CONVERSATION RIGHT NOW ON

TWITTER @NIGHTLYSHOW USING THEHASHTAG "TONIGHTLY."

SO THE BIG NEWS TODAY, JOE BIDENNOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

DO YOU THINK HE SHOULD RUN?

DO YOU, HE MISSED OUT?

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

>> FOR ME, I THINK THAT, YOUKNOW, PEOPLE HAVE NOW TAKEN A

SPORTS ATTITUDE TO POLITICS SOIT'S KIND OF LIKE, YOU KNOW,

WHEN LeBRON DIDN'T GO BACK TOMIAMI, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?

THAT'S THEIR CHEERING ON, LIKE,"HE WAS OUR BOY!

HE'S GONE!

NOW WHAT DO WE DO!

HE WAS OUR FIRST ROUND PICK!

HE'S OVER."

IT'S MORE THAN THAT BUT I THINKIT'S NOT THE END OF THE WORLD.

>> I DON'T THINK HE SHOULD HAVERUN.

HE IS 72 YEARS OLD.

HE SHOULDN'T BE RUNNING AFTERANYTHING.

HE MIGHT BE OLDER THAN THAT, WHOKNOWS?

>> Larry: A FRIEND OF MINETHINKS THERE WAS SOME BACKROOM

DEAL BETWEEN IT HILLARY, OBAMA,AND BIDEN.

THIS IS TRUE, LIKE HE SAID IN2008.

WHERE THEY'RE LIKE, BIDEN, IT'SHILLARY'S TURN NEXT.

DO YOU THINK THAT KIND KIND OFTHING HAPPENS?

>> I LOVE THAT THEORY.

>> Larry: IT SOUNDSINTERESTING.

>> I'M ON BOARD WITH THAT.

I LIKE THAT THEORY BECAUSE ITSUGGESTS A METHOD TO THE

MADNESS.

IT JUST GIVES ME A LEVEL OFCOMFORT, SURE, THERE ARE

BACKROOM DEALS TO ALL OF IT.

FINE, GREAT, I BELIEVE IT.

>> Larry: I CAN'T IMAGINE,"ALL RIGHT, HILLARY, YOU GOT

NEXT."

>> IT'S LIKE SPORTS.

YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?

THEY DO IT FOR TEAMS, THEY DO ITALL THE TIME.

BACKROOM DEALS HAPPEN ALL THETIME.

>> IF THERE WAS A BACKROOM DEALTHERE PROBABLY WAS ONE BUT WE'LL

NEVER KNOW ABOUT IT BECAUSE WECAN'T SEE THOSE E-MAILS.

( LAUGHTER )>> WOW.

>> Larry: DO YOU THINK BIDENCOULD HAVE BEATEN HILLARY?

>> I THINK BIDEN ABSOLUTELYWOULD HAVE.

HE WOULD HAVE-- HE WOULD HAVEBEATEN HILLARY.

>> Larry: REALLY?

>> BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE HIM MORETHAN HILLARY.

PEOPLE TRUST HIM MORE THANHILLARY.

UNFORTUNATELY, WITH THE LOSS OFHIS SON, HE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN

THE SYMPATHY VOTE.

>> Larry: YOU THINK HE MESSEDUP.

YOU THINK HE REALLY COULD HAVEBEAT HER.

>> WELL, IT WORKED ON "SCANDAL."

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )>> SHE'S RIGHT!

>> IT DID.

IT WAS ON "SCANDAL," BECAUSEFITZ WAS DOWN IN THE POLLS.

AND THEN HIS SON DIED OF THIS,LIKE, SECRET INJECTION OF A RARE

STRAIN OF BACTERIAL MENINGITIS.

>> OH, MY GOD.

HORRIBLE.

>> I REMEMBER THAT, GIRL!

>> EXACTLY, EXACTLY RIGHT.

THAT IS TRUE.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

THAT IS TRUE.

>> Larry: WHO WOULD HAVE BEENMORE FUN, BIDEN-TRUMP OR

HILLARY-TRUMP?

WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE FUN?

BIDEN-TRUMP WOULD HAVE BEEN ALOT OF FUN.

>> CAN I REJECT THE FUNDAMENTALPREMISE OF THAT QUESTION AND SAY

I'M NOT READY TO ASSUME DONALDTRUMP ANYTHING.

CAN WE JUST-->> HE WASN'T READY!

>> I DO THINK -->> IT WOULD BE LIKE GOOFY AND

DOPEY OR-->> IT WOULD BE TWEEDLE DEE AND

TWEEDLE DUMB-ASS.

>> I THINK THERE IS IT AN ACTUALINTERESTING PARALLEL IF HE HAD

RUN.

YOU LOOK AT THE CANDIDATES WHOARE RESONATING BEYOND HILLARY,

TRUMP-- GOD HELP US ALL.

EVEN BERNIE.

THESE ARE GUYS WHO ARE, YOUKNOW, FRANK, BRUTALLY HONEST,

OUTSPOKEN-- WHATEVER IT IS--THEY'RE AUTHENTIC.

THEY'RE OUTSIDE THE POLITICALSPECTRUM TO SOME DEGREE.

BIDEN HAS ALWAYS HAD THAT ABOUTHIM.

AND SOMETIMES THEY MANIFEST INIT WEIRD GAFFES AND STUFF HE'D

RATHER GET AWAY FROM, BUT HE ISKIND OF AN EARNEST BLUE-COLLAR

TYPE GUY SO I THINK HE WOULDHAVE HAD HAD A LOT OF TRACTION.

>> Larry: I THINK IT WOULD BEHILARIOUS IF SANDERS ASKED HIM

TO BE VICE PRESIDENT AGAIN.

DO YOU THINK SANDERS HAS ACHANCE TO BEAT HILLARY AT THIS

POINT?

SANDERS HAS-- I THINK SANDERS--I'M SORRY, I THINK HE'S ANOTHER

ONE OF THOSE CANDIDATES WE WON'TKNOW NOTHING UNTIL PEOPLE START

VOTING FOR SURE.

WE REALLY WON'T.

IT'S LIKE THE TRUMP THING.

THE GUY IN THE AUDIENCE, YOU GOTMAD WHEN I SAID TRUMP.

YOU COULDN'T IMAGINE A FUTURE.

I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT GUYS, I'MTELLING YOU ALMOST ALMOST

THROWING UP IN MY MOUTH.

I THINK SOMETHING UNEXPECTEDHAPPENS IN THIS ELECTION, AND I

DON'T THINK WE SHOULD COUNT OUTPEOPLE LIKE BERNIE SANDERS.

BERNIE SANDERS IS TOUCHING ANERVE.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )BUT THE REASON WHY I SAY THAT IS

IF PEOPLE ARE FEELING SO MUCHTHEY WANT SOMEBODY LIKED BY NEN

THIS RACE, WHY?

BIDEN IN THIS RACE, WHY?

RIGHT?

>> AND THEY CAN TRUST BERNIE.

I THINK PEOPLE TRUST BERNIEBECAUSE--

>> BERNIE KEEPS IT 100.

>> HE KEEPS IT 100.

HE'S TELLING YOU THE TRUTH RIGHTOFF THE BAT, ALL THE TIME

WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH HIM ORNOT, AND I DO THINK HE HAS THE

A.A.R.P. VOTE LOCKED UP.

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )>> THE TRUTH IS THAT THE MORE

YOU HEAR SOMETHING, THE MORE YOUTEND TO ACCEPT IT.

AND I THINK THE MORE THEY HEARHIM AND THE MORE YOU SEE HIM, IT

BECOMES MORE ACCEPTABLE.

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED WITH TRUMP.

THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED.

THE MORE HE TALKED, THE MOREHEEFT OUT THERE.

THE MORE HE BECAME ACCEPTABLE.

>> Larry: THE DIFFERENCE ISTRUMP IS LIKE WHACK.

AND THE MORE PEOPLE LISTEN TOIT, HE GOT MORE FAMOUS, AND THEN

BERNIE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, AND THEMORE PEOPLE LISTEN TO HIM, THE

MORE THEY'RE GETTING ON BOARD.

IT'S TRUTH VERSUS CONFUSION.

>> BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND--BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND HOW

PEOPLE THINK.

PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT THETRUTH.

THEY WANT TO HEAR WHAT THEY WANTTO HEAR.

IT'S LIKE YOU CAN SEE SOMETHINGTHAT'S REALLY, REALLY HORRIBLE,

AND AND LOOK AT THAT ONEGREAT THING IN THERE THAT IS

REALLY WHAT I STAND FOR.

THE TRUTH IS REALLY NOT WHATWE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE,

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE TALKINGABOUT POLITICS.

>> Larry: WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )

( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )>> Larry: WELCOME BACK!

ALL RIGHT, IT'S TIME FOR THESEGMENT WE LIKE TO CALL KEEP IT

100.

I KNOW.

EVERYBODY THAT DOESN'T KNOWTHAT, IT MEANS KEEP IT 100%

REAL.

KEEP IT 100 OR KEEP ITONE-HUNAH.

EITHER OF THOSE WAYS.

RON YOU'RE GOING TO BE FIRST.

IF YOU KEEP IT 100, YOU GET ASTICKER, IF NOT I THROW WEAK TEA

AT YOU.

>> I'M READY.

>> Larry: YOU KEEP IT 100 INYOUR WORK ALL THE TIME.

>> I TRY.

>> Larry: YOU DO ALL YOURWORK.

YOU'VE BEEN IN A LOT OFDANGEROUS SITUATIONS ALL OVER

THE WORLD.

THIS IS ALSO THE ANNIVERSARY OF"BACK TO THE FUTURE."

IF YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME ANDSTOP ONE FAMOUS ASSASSINATION,

WHICH "K" WOULD YOU SAY, J.F.K.,R.F.K., OR M.L.K.?"

KEEP IN MIND, YOU'RE ON A PANELWITH THREE BLACK PEOPLE.

>> WHAT IS THAT, MAN?

>> YEAH, WHICH ONE IS IT?

>> Larry: I WANT YOU TO KEEPIT 100.

YOU CAN'T PANDER.

WHICH "K"?

>> I'M NOT IT PANDERING.

I'M JUST TRYING TO WALK OUT OFHERE.

M.L.K., BUT THAT IS-- THAT ISINDEPENDENT OF ANYTHING ELSE.

>> Larry: WHY DO YOU SAYM.L.K.?

HE ALREADY HAD HIS DREAM.

>> I THINK THERE IS-- IF WE LOOKBACK WE HAVE NO-- NO SHORTAGE OF

POLITICIANS AS WE HAVE ALL SEEN,AS WE'VE ALL TALKED ABOUT.

>> Larry: THE KENNEDY FAMILYLIKE... NOT A SHORTAGE OF

POLITICIANS.

>> THERE IS NOT A GREAT WAY TOANSWER THAT THANK YOU.

( APPLAUSE )VERY GOOD.

>> Larry: TERRY.

>> I'M SCARED.

>> Larry: IT'S ALL RIGHT.

YOU DID A VERY POPULAR MOVIE--ACTUALLY IT'S VERY POPULAR IN

THIS BUILDING-- CALLED "THEEXPENDABLES."

YES.

I MEAN, LISTEN TO THE CAST,SYLVESTER STALLONE, ARNOLD

SCHWARZENEGGER, STEVE AUSTIN,MICKEY ROARKE.

WHICH IS THE MOST EXPENDABLE OFTHE EXPENDABLES?

KEEP IT 100!

>> I'M GOING TO KEEP IT REAL00.

MICKEY ROARKE, MICKEY ROARKE.

WE ASKED HIM TO COME BACK, ANDHE'S LIKE," I WANT TO GET MORE

MONEY THAN ANYBODY."

YOU HAVE TO PLAY WITH US, MAN!

>> Larry: THAT'S KEEPING IT100.

YOU ALSO GET AN EXPENDABLESQUESTION.

>> OH, BOY.

>> Larry: THIS IS A ( BLEEP )KILL SITUATION.

THIS IS HOW WE PLAY THE GAME IT,BY THE WAY. THREE EXPENDABLES:

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,SYLVESTERSTALLONE AND MICKEY

ROARKE.

>> SYLVESTER STALLONE, ARBARNOLDSCHWARZENEGGER.

>> I'M KILLING MICKEY ROARKE.

SYLVESTER STALLONE, AND ARNOLDSCHWARZENEGGER, I AM NOT

MARRYING HIM BECAUSE OF WHAT HEDOES.

THAT MEANS I'M ( BLEEP ),( BLEEP ), ( BLEEP ).

AND I'M MARRYING SYLVESTERSTALLONE.

>> Larry: WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK.